![guy ritchie films guy ritchie films](https://files.list.co.uk/images/film-posters/s/sherlock-holmes-a-game-of-shadows-tt1515091.jpg)
Although Troy was by no means a great movie, Bana’s portrayal of the legendary Hector was the best part of it. So seeing them together won’t feel self indulgent like other celebrity packed pictures. Jude Law hasn’t done anything noteworthy in a while, and Eric Bana has also been far too absent. It’s star-studded enough to be exciting, but not too star-studded that it makes you suspicious it can’t live up to its promise like other star studded dissapointments. The supporting players.Įric Bana as a warrior. He is, in short, the perfect choice for what Ritchie aims to do with the character, and he just might do what Clive Owen failed to do: make King Arthur compelling. Hunnam’s tough-guy charisma rivals Tom Hardy’s. Good guys are boring… Our King Arthur is not a good guy from the beginning.” Luke Skywalker was always the most uninteresting character in Star Wars because he’s the good guy. Unfortunately, they’re not interesting to watch. The two qualities make rather compatible bed companions. Ritchie told EW: “I think where the pitfall has often been is trying to make King Arthur bland and nice, and nice and bland.
![guy ritchie films guy ritchie films](https://movified.co/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Untitled-design-8.png)
And, his swagger game is on point, which is good, because to the surprise of no one, Guy Ritchie’s Arthur will have some swagger. His rage is bone-chilling his silent pain reactions are unparalleled - as anyone who watched Sons of Anarchy knows from this scene in particular and if you’ve seen Judd Apatow’s short-lived cult favorite Undeclared, you know he can do light and charming too. But as I have discussed a time or two, Hunnam is a consistently interesting performer who is neither boring nor obvious.
![guy ritchie films guy ritchie films](https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/rupert-grint-tca.jpg)
Presumably, they took one look at him, said, “OK, handsome, you’re hired,” and if he can act, great, but otherwise, the transparent goal is to draw the dude-liking demographic of the population - and in the same vein as Tom Hardy, maybe inspire non-dude-liking members to question their stance. The star.įor those unfamiliar with Charlie Hunnam, it’s easy to think casting such a hideous King Arthur is a boringly obvious choice. The whole thing is crazier than a shithouse tarantula … so crazy, in fact, that it just might work.
Guy ritchie films full#
It’s among the first stories to perpetuate the notion of chivalry, and Ritchie is known for his gritty narratives full of street thugs and fast cuts. Ritchie and King Arthur are also a strange paring because it’s traditionally a rather wholesome tale. So it’s bold, ballsy, and risky for Guy Ritchie to expect a huge franchise to spring from a story that doesn’t have a set of modern popular novels to draw from or a devoted following - not that it doesn’t have one, but academics and people who liked the story as kids aren’t at the same level as Marvel or GoT fanboys. And even Marvel didn’t say they were making six Thor or Iron Man movies when the first installments came out - they played it coy pre- Joss Whedon. This is insane for several reasons, the first and foremost being that, although everyone has at least a passing familiarity with the story of King Arthur, it doesn’t inspire the level of zealous devotion as Game of Thrones, Harry Potter, The Lord of the Rings or Marvel movies. Next summer will see the first installment of Knights of the Roundtable: King Arthur, a planned six (!)-film epic directed by Guy Ritchie, the man behind Snatch, Sherlock Holmes and Lock, Stock And Two Smoking Barrels.